[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Writing a tool for Shared Persistent Windows Boot Image
- To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Jim Burnes" <jvburnes@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:15:08 -0600
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Anthony Liguori <anthony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:13:05 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=OVj0un9JEUmZciQXPilOy8bffSfroaG7MNUtyhj3K9PgLSe2vV6yD27rzHV/AeqHqmKDeQOOZsYx3jaGhKnRdLNgtMNLaCn1j9nhWoIzJ9FQSGWU6Frkg4eQPOIRU0P8f7oKeGgzbpGkkN4CE7Asv/p3PoB6GvJfqUugBCw1+eU=
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Dan,
Since blktap looks broken on HVM for the forseeable future (a real shame if you ask me), what's the next best thing? LVM snapshots? How can I get LVM snapshots to use use less main memory? Will it help if I decrease the max size of the copy-on-write snapshot? Usually our copy-on-write area is no larger than 20MB.
Jim Burnes
On 6/28/07, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:18:47PM -0600, Jim Burnes wrote: > Anthony (and anyone else listening), > > I've installed Centos 5, Xen 3.1 (from the Xensource RPMs) and installed a > base Windows image to an LVM to test.
> > The installation wen't fairly well and I resolved various issues like > getting the VMs to render to VNC displays properly. > > I even used LVM snapshotting to do some quick copy-on-write tests. In that
> configuration I've had up to 7 Windows VMs running at the same time, on > separate IPs, writing to LVM copy-on-write snapshots. The only problem is > that LVM cow snapshots consume too much main memory.
> > So I proceeded to my final test which was to replace the LVM storage with > QCOW storage and see how many Windows VMs I could run concurrently. (I'm > trying for 12). > > The only cow tool I had was qcow-create, so I downloaded the qemu RPMs and
> installed them. > > I used img2qcow to convert my installed Windows LVM image to the qcow base > image. > I used qcow-img to create a copy-on-write snapshot of the base image. > I tried to boot with this as the new storage type by specifiying:
> > disk = [ 'tap:qcow:/var/lib/xen/image/winflp.img,hda1,w', > 'file:/var/lib/xen/install/winflp.iso,hdc:cdrom,r'] > > (and other variations, by using 'hda' instead of 'hda1', using 'tap:aio'
> instead of 'tap:qcow') > > But everytime I try to start the vm by 'xm create' it seems to create the VM > and the VM immediately exits, leaving hardly any trace of even booting. I
> tried booting directly to hard drive C: and I tried booting to the CDROM. > Booting to the CDROM worked fine but reported no attached hard drive. > > The only thing I see is a trace in the xend.log
file which indicates that > xend (or the VM) is attempting to generate some sort of hotplug event for > tap. Then the whole VM shuts down. > > Is there something I need to do before tap:qcow works?
> > I suspect, but am having a hard time proving that either: > > (1) My version of Xen 3.1 doesn't support tap:qcow or
It is not possible to use blktap with HVM guests - there was code which tried
to make it work, but its utterly broken[1]. In my spare time I'm trying to fix it, but no ETA.
Dan. [1] it is calling APIS in XenD which no longer exist & has a try..except block which silently catches & ignores the errors, so you never notice
that it failed. -- |=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=| |=- Perl modules: http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/
-=| |=- Projects: http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=| |=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|