[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] DomU better performance than Dom0



Hi Jian,

I am running CentOS 5, and didn't have any problems with my network connection so I just downloaded UnixBench to it directly. You could try mounting the image file in Dom0, and copy over UnixBench.

--John

jian zhang wrote:
Hi John,
I think this results are not so exact, because the first time I run unbixbench on my machine, the performance with xen is better that without xen. So, you can run it again, and DO NOT do other things while run unixbench. What kind DomainU you installed on your machine? I used Unixbench to measure the performance, my results are:
Fedora 6 without xen:

INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 4149904.9 355.6
Double-Precision? Whetstone 55.0 1024.7 186.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 2331.1 542.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 236222.0 596.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 71599.0 432.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 550196.0 948.6
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 501010.4 402.7
Process Creation 126.0 7753.6 615.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1012.3 1687.2
System Call Overhead 15000.0 558716.2 372.5
======
FINAL SCORE 517.2

Fedora with xen:

INDEX VALUES
TEST BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 4441113.2 380.6
Double-Precision? Whetstone 55.0 1039.3 189.0
Execl Throughput 43.0 1798.8 418.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 376698.0 951.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 130982.0 791.4
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 429981.0 741.3
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 658735.5 529.5
Process Creation 126.0 3831.6 304.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 226.0 376.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 683112.7 455.4
=========
FINAL SCORE 464.1

It seems the difference between my results is much smaller than you. BTW, I installed domainU in xen by img files, however, my ether net interface card doesn't work with DomainU, so I can not run benchmark in domainU. Can you suggest any other way to run it or tell me how you installed domainU?

2007/7/31, John T. Yocum <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>:

    The benchmark I used is called UnixBench.

    --John

    jian zhang wrote:
     > Hi:
     > I also want to measure the performance of Xenlinux, but I don't know
     > which tools to use, would you please tell me which tool you used
    for the
     > following results.
     > Thank you very much!!
     >
     > 2007/7/31, John T. Yocum < john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
     > <mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>>:
     >
     >     Hello!
     >
     >     I've got an interesting performance problem, I'm running Xen
    3.1 on a
     >     Dell with 2 x Quad-core 2.33Ghz CPUs, and 4GB RAM. Running
    UnixBench on
     >     the system without Xen the performance is pretty good, but
    once running
     >     Xen the performance drops by a large amount.
     >
     >     Any insight into why the score is so much lower with Xen would be
     >     appreciated. (UnixBench scores at bottom)
     >
     >     Thanks,
     >     John
     >
     >     CentOS 5 without Xen
     >
     >                           INDEX VALUES
     >     TEST                                        BASELINE
     >     RESULT      INDEX
     >
     >     Dhrystone 2 using register variables        376783.7 52116444.7
     >     1383.2
     >     Double-Precision Whetstone                       83.1
     >     2612.0      314.3
     >     Execl Throughput
     >     188.3    11429.1      607.0
     >     File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0
     >     155443.0      581.7
     >     File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks
     >     1077.0    37493.0      348.1
     >     File Read 4096 bufsize 8000
     >     maxblocks        15382.0  1475439.0       959.2
     >     Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6
     >     548465.7      355.0
     >     Pipe Throughput
     >     111814.6  3313637.0       296.4
     >     Process Creation
     >     569.3     34050.6      598.1
     >     Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8
     >     3566.8      796.2
     >     System Call Overhead
     >     114433.5   2756155.3      240.9
> =========
     >           FINAL
     >     SCORE                                                     510.9
     >
     >     CentOS 5 Dom0
     >
     >                           INDEX VALUES
     >     TEST                                        BASELINE
     >     RESULT      INDEX
     >
     >     Dhrystone 2 using register variables         376783.7 50864253.7
     >     1350.0
     >     Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1
     >     2617.9       315.0
     >     Execl Throughput                               188.3
     >     2786.5       148.0
     >     File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0
     >     159749.0      597.9
     >     File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks
     >     1077.0    44884.0      416.8
     >     File Read 4096 bufsize 8000
     >     maxblocks        15382.0  1191772.0      774.8
     >     Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6
     >     306121.8       198.2
     >     Pipe Throughput
     >     111814.6  1417645.2       126.8
     >     Process Creation                               569.3
     >     4699.2       82.5
     >     Shell Scripts (8
     >     concurrent)                     44.8      781.6      174.5
     >     System Call Overhead
     >     114433.5  1021813.7       89.3
> =========
     >           FINAL
     >     SCORE                                                     261.6
     >
     >     CentOS 5 DomU
     >
     >                           INDEX VALUES
     >     TEST                                        BASELINE
     >     RESULT      INDEX
     >
     >     Dhrystone 2 using register variables         376783.7 38015133.3
     >     1008.9
     >     Double-Precision Whetstone                      83.1
     >     2023.4      243.5
     >     Execl Throughput                               188.3
     >     3877.4       205.9
     >     File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks         2672.0   270737.0
     >     1013.2
     >     File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks
     >     1077.0    78470.0      728.6
     >     File Read 4096 bufsize 8000
     >     maxblocks        15382.0  1227115.0      797.8
     >     Pipe Throughput
     >     111814.6  1383157.5      123.7
     >     Pipe-based Context Switching                 15448.6
     >     310378.3       200.9
     >     Process Creation                               569.3
     >     7534.8      132.4
     >     Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    44.8
     >     1179.6      263.3
     >     System Call Overhead
     >     114433.5  1056362.3       92.3
> =========
     >           FINAL
     >     SCORE                                                     308.2
     >
     >     _______________________________________________
     >     Xen-users mailing list
     >     Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    <mailto:Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mailto:
    Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
     >     http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
     >
     >




_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.