[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Live migration: 2500ms downtime
- To: "Luciano Rocha" <strange@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Marconi Rivello" <marconirivello@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:18:53 -0300
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 10:19:23 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Iz2DbxLRNoLFNOJcSwu4sfH8HKX999Kf+qQJtlCiB3ImkI1ZIRLLzFk9WGk1jJVt1H1SOC3wU4//SHETNkZxhEGaBlLHgXXKHklkGR9Mwkc+XGwm7Gtou2C4nwPnzT0946V7u9D3+IR3kU/Ww6Tx5K1RuILhh2bhNK0QLWi5LFc=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
Hi, Luciano.
On 8/10/07, Luciano Rocha <strange@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 12:42:08PM -0300, Marconi Rivello wrote:
> Another issue that I described on a previous email (which, unfortunately,
> didn't get any replies) is that this downtime increases to more than 20
> seconds if I set the domU's memory to 512MB (the maxmem set is 1024MB). I
> repeated the test successively, from one side to the other, with mem set to
> 512 and 1024, and the result was always the same. Around 3s with mem =
> maxmem, and around 24s with mem=512 and maxmem=1024.
>
You are using the option --live to migrate, aren't you?
Yes, I am. :)
Even if I weren't, it would make sense to expect a lower downtime (or the same downtime) by reducing the domU memory. But it takes longer if I reduce the domU's memory.
Would you happen to have any ideas on why it behaves like that? --
lfr
0/0
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
Thanks,
Marconi.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
