[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen/VMWare co-existence?


  • To: "Gary W. Smith" <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Stephen Carville" <stephen.carville@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:00:41 -0700
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Martin Goldstone <m.j.goldstone@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 23:01:22 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=t60a6tGN11JinAwShRgE0UDx4H03A4A+IkwvyiM1T4NjkE7rkK0Hv/zrqfTDEeZaCRWnf5b+kAFd/Sua3D+hwPtPb2BtdV17MC7ClIUwcL0V5Bgp3/ZzcOeAedeEFLExRoB056C/GlW43wc8dj1TLsKh+1loLcwRJ414k9Vs4qo=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 8/16/07, Gary W. Smith <gary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> Oddball suggestion:
>
> Download the Linux version of VMWare Server, run it on the Dom0.  Do both at
> the same time.  I've never tried it but I don't see why it wouldn't work.

I tried that on a Core2 box and it did NOT work.  Either VMware
crashed or the box froze.

>
>  ________________________________
>  From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of
> Martin Goldstone
> Sent: Thu 8/16/2007 4:02 AM
> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-users] Xen/VMWare co-existence?
>
>
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working on a project recently which we want to virtualize.  It
> runs on Windows Server 2003, so my first attempt was to put it in a HVM
> domU.  Sadly, this application requires network performance higher than
> HVM is seemingly capable of.  In the absence of PV drivers for Windows,
> I tried running it on VMWare instead, and I got the extra network
> performance I was looking for.
>
> However, rather than having to have VMware hosts alongside Xen hosts,
> I'd much rather run VMware on the same physical box as Xen.  Obviously I
> can't run it in dom0 or in a PV domU (according to what I've seen on the
> net, the kernel modules VMware uses attempt to force it into ring 0,
> which causes a General Protection Fault), so I've tried running it in a
> HVM domU (CentOS 5, with PV drivers to improve the network performance).
>  I've seen several posts on several lists via Google suggesting that HVM
> domU's have a virtual ring 0, which should suffice.  While I'm no longer
> getting a GPF, the Windows VM still refuses to start, most of the time
> giving me no error message but sometimes it pops up a box telling me
> about an unrecoverable error, unexpected signal 11.  I can't determine
> anything useful from the log file either.
>
> So, the question is, has anyone tried (or had any success with) getting
> VMware and Xen to co-exist on the same box?  If you have, how did you do
> it?  If not, I'd appreciate any ideas as to how to achieve this, or
> (perhaps preferably) any hints to improve network performance under HVM.
>    Or if anyone's got any alternative ideas I'd be happy to hear them.
> Of course, the best solution would be to have open source PV drivers for
> Windows, but I don't think that's even on the horizon.
>
> Thanks in advance for any input.
>
>
> Martin
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFGxC7FRnwIDhcMR9MRApm5AJ9iqiGOh65tW3CMqafLUhPKue14JwCeNG4X
> FaqSS7lHwXFK9+aL7gsHjM0=
> =5AJT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>


-- 
Stephen Carville

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.