Re: [Xen-users] xen - binary or compilation?

[kanour-xen <xen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Ok then. I thought that Etch uses Xen 3.0.3-1 which is 3.0.3, but I was 
probably wrong.
Thanks

[STD]Ein wrote:
> Debian Etch includes Xen 3.1 packages (2.6.18-5-xen-686 packages), and you
> can get 3.1 for Sarge in backports.  I'm using the Debian packages on an x86
> system and haven't had any issues, or found any shortcomings.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of kanour-xen
> Sent: November 11, 2007 1:47 AM
> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-users] xen - binary or compilation?
>
> Hi.
>
> Just simple question. I have Debian distribution. In the past I always 
> compiled Xen from source. However, Xen packages are already included in 
> Debian Stable (amd64).
> What is worth? Compiling or using binary installation of newest Xen 3.1 
> or using the debian packages of Xen 3.0.3?
> Thanks for your opinion.
>
> Jiri
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>   

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users