[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Re: [quagga-users 9274] My eth0 is NOT down -- but quagga says it is?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Code Monkey" <have.an.email@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:23:03 +0100
Delivery-date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 23:23:59 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=mhoypPjllHbFMW4OkvcO3JPNvyiTQvVrCYw1eEsAR/lKBYgM4XBTOwmPXjIzqrt5gdVqn76glp+N3xOJNtA/SY7aHJp7edmbYIHeY7r6OxzJDjAAAfMRdzKGjHktdZuZkaNYVFUowxm6EDQH90mRyU5pkA5mEUZVVJHnVfxAR6Q=
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 2008-01-12, I wrote:
> Quagga [on Xen non-bridged dom0] refuses to recognize my eth0
> interface that seems to work perfectly otherwise. [...] where should I look?

Currently my only idea is to look at the quagga code to see where
exactly it looks for the interfaces, and try the same system calls to
see if I get something unexpected.

I would like to avoid that if possible...

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

References:
- [Xen-users] Re: [quagga-users 9274] My eth0 is NOT down -- but quagga says it is?
  - From: Code Monkey

Prev by Date: [Xen-users] M2N32, suse 10.3 and network problem
Next by Date: [Xen-users] ramdisk is not compatible !!!
Previous by thread: [Xen-users] Re: [quagga-users 9274] My eth0 is NOT down -- but quagga says it is?
Next by thread: [Xen-users] Xen Over SuSE 10.3 - Dog Catches Car - Thank you Jim and Jonathon
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.