[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.2 & CentOS


  • To: Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Vinod Kumar" <s.vinod79@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:23:53 +0530
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 04:54:37 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=UDDw23u0rV9i+X7ryvHfTRgMil66+F6X3yLtoEpMZ+o8375c25dVHlgpf8Ad21drfOmOdOoljG5qAIVs6hlCF5q2ewvH5iSe3j8SIG/Yn1J5dScaA/kUkp9ErQOB9Sdf/L1pFJcX12dc4SUKCzljYuyJE9FvzBO0+I8/tiLOgLQ=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>



On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 7:18 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Vinod Kumar wrote:
>
> On 2/27/08, *Nico Kadel-Garcia* <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     John Morris wrote:
>     > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
>     >> Can't you install rhe Xensource.com <http://Xensource.com>
>     RPM's as upgrades to the
>     >> Centos/RHEL RPM's? I've certainly done so with CentOS and RHEL, 4.x
>     >> and 5.x. There are some subtle differences between them, and I
>     >> haven't tried the 3.2 RPM's myself.
>     > Can you point me to those?  The xen.org <http://xen.org> RPMs at
>     > http://xen.org/download/dl_32rhel5.html don't include 64-bit
>     versions,
>     > and going to xensource.com <http://xensource.com>, I get lost in
>     a maze of marketing.
>     >
>     >    John
>     >
>     Looks like you need to recompile from the SRPM. Do you have a 64-bit
>     system to do it on?
>
>
> I was looking for xen 3.2 64bit for the similar reason (32 bit domU
> crashes on 64bit dom0).I tried to build the source rpm of xen 3.2
> (downloaded from
> http://bits.xensource.com/oss-xen/release/3.2.0/centos-5.1/xen-3.2.0-0xs.centos5.src.rpm)  using
> rpmbuild on a CentOS 5.1(x86_64), and I got the below error:
>
> RPM build errors:
>     Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:
>    /usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader
>
> Please let me know the changes required for building the src.rpm on 64
> bit system?
>
> I was curious to know about the existing installation and I found that
> the package xen-3.0.3-41.el5-x86_64, installs all the binaries and
> libs in /usr/lib64/xen, but puts the hvmloader in /usr/lib/xen!
>
> Thanks,
> Vinod
Huh. Interesting. RedHat's SRPM's are a bit more sophisticated than
those for Xensource, traditionally, so I'm not shocked you found a
discrepancy building it for x86_64. Perhaps you can review the
differences in the .spec files and see how RedHat did it?

Solved, the problem was the /usr/lib/xen/hvmloader line was commented in  xen.spec file.   Now I have the xen-3.2.0-0xs rpms.  Now I have a silly question  Should I rebuild the Linux kernel available @ xen.org to get xen 3.2 up or will it work with CentOS kernel?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.