[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Disk performance in HVM vs PV


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Saúl Ibarra" <saghul@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 13:18:17 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:18:47 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=fLUOiyAJCkZ8h6FIQTq7cS3CGfuTBTn5bWPcEk/3y7u8hARdXOEn7AjL8hNlfCqei+UJ9cNghe+FTsC6YBOgRtMJjr0M6vCCrtuWHxwboaj7QhrXLMObkHvNfehQwDlU1COojbt2yWaLMPXOhlT/x4bAwB30WoEejCQk22bSyzI=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hi:

I've a Xen installation setup with LVM and I'm wondering wich one
gives better performance: HVM domU or paravirtualized one?

Thanks in advance!

-- 
Saúl -- "Nunca subestimes el ancho de banda de un camión lleno de disketes."
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.saghul.net/

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.