Re: [Xen-devel] Fwd: [Xen-users] Missing 3.2 binary install package

[Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>]

jim burns wrote:
> On Thursday 28 February 2008 09:56:41 am Ian Jackson wrote:
>   
> > Failing that, I would
> > suggest building the hypervisor or the kernel (whichever you don't
> > have) from the source tarballs on the xen.org website.  Vendors' dom0
> > kernels intended for 3.1 are generally useable with 3.2.
> >     
> What are the limits here? Would the xen.gz 3.0.3 compiled with the dom0 
> kernel, such as found with Centos, work with the xen 3.2 tarball? I would 
> assume the compatibility code would let it work, but what features would 
> be unsupported/not functional? Thanx.
>   
It should, it has for work I've done before. The DomU kernels are much 
more forward compatible with more recent Dom0 kernels than the reverse: 
it's not really suprising.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users