[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Release 0.8.0 of GPL PV Drivers for Windows
- To: "jim burns" <jim_burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Emre ERENOGLU" <erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2008 20:32:46 +0100
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sat, 01 Mar 2008 11:33:21 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=MMmKK/vzIGFLq0/aTdEw8lA1jjiJC0OdkHqsgGe9D0Kd77Ybr/8Z7ZcnQzbmeU5c797osoOZ4PJBjIJbSw2ynBa5OUlOfaLvFfKWUEL7X3fpib9AMfo/VhbShJb6PKAOTopVoJ2xQooDMIpLdYXQH6sPHbNPlNl1uX4Y+o9IoAM=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
Well, I didn't compare a real Paravirtual Pardus DomU (I'm sure it matches your values previously posted), wrt the unmodified_drivers. I can do that if I can get the system back up :)
Emre
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 4:51 PM, jim burns < jim_burn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Saturday 01 March 2008 09:50:13 am Emre ERENOGLU wrote:
> When I tested these on Xen 3.1 on Pardus Linux DomU, I was getting very
> similar performance on -disks- with hdparm. No other "reliable" tests were
> performed. I also didn't test the network card.
Did you compare the Pardus standard domu performance with Pardus + 'unmodified
drivers'?
Btw, thanx for mentioning those drivers. The README was confusing to me about
whether those drivers go into the domu or dom0, but in either case, it looked
like they wouldn't help with a Windows domu.
--
Emre Erenoglu
erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
