[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-users] Conflict with Xen bridge?
Daniel, I am new to using Linux and Xen but here is what I have had to do to get Xebr0 working. When you do the install, you are asked to use DHCP or manually input and IP. When using DHCP I couldn't get Xenbro to come up as an option when I started using Paravirtualization (gui one) as an option. Only option I had was VIRTUAL and using the vifxx option. When I rebuilt using an assigned (manual) IP Xenbr0 became an option and everything worked - each VM was assigned an IP and could be seen outside our firewall. I have rebuilt these machines about 20 times (one PE2950 housing three virtual RHEL5 OS connected to an EMC array)now since we are migrating off our IBM mainframe to a RedHat/Jboss/MySQL alternative. So while programmers are working on Java I have been playing with options for Linux/RHEL5.1 and Xen connected to a EMC CX-10c. A newbie here but hope that helps. Tony -----Original Message----- From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Daniel Bareiro Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 1:06 PM To: Xen-Users Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Conflict with Xen bridge? On Thursday, 27 March 2008 11:35:32 +0100, Marc Patino Gómez wrote: > Hi, Hi Marc. > About the wrapper script of network-bridge... I don't understand why > it don't work, try to execute it by hand > /etc/xen/scripts/network-bridge start bridge=xenbr0 vifnum=0 > ... and use brctl command to add, del interfaces and bridges... > Anyway, to debug the errors I will go step by step: > ----Important-----: > Think that your config in /etc/network/interfaces your eth0 the pppoe > interface is vif0.0 in dom0 ! and your are attaching it to xenbr0 > bridge with peth1 (eth1 physical interface) > Think about it, at the moment I don't have much time to give you a > more detailed answer :(. Mmmm... executing by hand the previous line, I got the following output. I suspect that it is the cause because of which the wrapper script don't work. ifdown: interface eth0 not configured SIOCSIFNAME: Device or resource busy But vifnum=1 causes that it loses the connectivity with LAN and Internet. Some idea about why it can happen? > To do your scenario I will create 2 bridges and the via iptables make > the FW , nat ... > Tell me about your progress, ;) Thanks for your time. I will try to read about advanced networking configuration with Xen. But I will accept any suggestion or comment that you can give me :-) Regards, Daniel -- Fingerprint: BFB3 08D6 B4D1 31B2 72B9 29CE 6696 BF1B 14E6 1D37 Powered by Debian GNU/Linux Lennt - Linux user #188.598 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |