Re: [Xen-users] CentOS 5.1 Xen 3.2 patches

[Bas Mevissen <abuse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > Ah, just found out that libvirt.i386 is (no longer?) a dependancy for 
> > something I have installed. OK, so now it is purely academic :-)
> Yes, I removed the silly artificial dependency with libvirt that
> RH created, because 3.2 no longer needs libvirt to properly function.
Something else (forgot what) was depending on libvirt.i386. So now I 
could already remove it without breaking something.
> Are you trying to run a 32-bit dom0 with a 64-bit hypervisor?
No. All 64-bit until now.

> You're doing it the "poor-man's method" where you run a 64-bit Xen,
> 64-bit dom0 and 32-bit userland aren't you?
Is is an x86_64 CentOS 5.1 install which also has some i386 stuff 
installed (by the installer). So the majority of the userland is 64-bit.
> > Hmmm, A CentOS i386 DomU on a x86_64 system. Does that work nowadays?
> It does with 3.2.
Great! Will give it a try.

Regards,

Bas.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users