[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] 32-bit OS images
Thanks Nick for all the information. Yes I want to do some performance measurements on pass-through I/O (and bridge I/O). So I just want one DomU. I guess thats two NICs one for each Dom*. Apart from lack of migration support, what are the other disadvantages? Also, how do i do this? Do i need to hide the PCI from Dom0 and add it using network-attach script? -Asim On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Nick Couchman <Nick.Couchman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > What is your reason for wanting to do passthrough I/O? The only really good > reason I can think of for it is that you have an application that requires > very high throughput and extremely low latency. Otherwise the bridge should > be fine, and I can think of several reasons why you don't want to use > passthrough I/O. One of which is the one you mentioned - migration will be > worthless because your domUs will be hardware dependent. > > > So, if you're still insistent upon doing passthrough I/O, then, yes, you'll > need one network card for every domU you have running. > > > -Nick > > > > >>> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Asim <linkasim@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > 2) You don't want to do direct NIC access to a domU, you want to use a > > bridge. By default XEN creates a bridge (can't remember what they're > > calling it these days) that bridges eth0 to all of your domUs. This > should > > allow you to use your single network card with as many domUs as you have > on > > your system. > > > > > > I want to do passthrough I/O for my specific needs and not use virbr0. > I believe > this will also disable migration if am not wrong? So, to do a direct NIC > access > I think I should hide this PCI from Domain-0, so will need a second > additional > NIC? > > -Asim > > > > ________________________________ > This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole > use of the intended recipient. If this email is not intended for you, or you > are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended > recipient, please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering > (SEAKR) Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you are strictly > prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using > this message, its contents or attachments in any way. If you have received > this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this > e-mail and delete the message from your mailbox. Information contained in > this message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither > endorsed by nor attributable to SEAKR. > > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |