[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] PV Drivers: XenSource ones VS GPL'ed


  • To: "Ruggero Tonelli" <ruggero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Emre ERENOGLU" <erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 21:44:09 +0200
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 12 May 2008 12:44:45 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=VJcPenOrDCa9UJO672+KD7RepFh9yK+mb1PziLtAgFqR5CnSs1dmAA2y6FixG8FaA9czwD46iQXJB1q1Hkv+Qtu/sseATsQ2luEMvGDhQ5gHAIWRidvwFjFV+q5RDg8BjOyEnOVcYtjdYJuE+fGS3NhZi4fN9D3lVJlVNDIRejs=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hi Ruggero:

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Ruggero Tonelli <ruggero@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi all,

I'm testing a windows 2003r2 installation on Centos 5 so i'im wondering about
the reliability of Windows PV drivers on a domU running on the GPL "flavor"
of XEN.

- which are the most stable PV drivers GPL'ed ones or XenSource ones?
Xensource shall be more stable at this moment.

- is safe running the XenSource ones on a GPL XEN machine or vice-versa?
You can't run Xensource ones on GPL version of Xen.  This is the downside of them, they can only be used if you're a paid customer of Xensource.


thanks,

--
Ruggero Tonelli
http://www.valtellinux.it
GPG Key-id: 0x96998647

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 
Emre Erenoglu
erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.