[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] DomU slower with smp?


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Janusz Ulanowski" <janul666@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 01:34:00 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 14 May 2008 17:34:32 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=hfWcz4af7Qz4YpRw1CW5P7x0JbYpvYWN5hriMUWe3fcJ2P0LO2+ObXUc2LmiuJVMgMxhWzzf0dZSsoWVM+4KREye/FG4TwmJOgr7ZzsmuHswr4iE2ExQnB3p2dVE3LhDbM5IcFTbTtfXqAKmNM9Vc5Z1iZCtlgRc+SbGEncCBq8=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>



2008/5/15 Nick Anderson <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Janusz Ulanowski wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for your answer.
I've done as you said.
Unfortunatelly no difference.
it goes worse when I increase file size or threads number.

for:
time iozone -t 40 -r 2m -s 100m -m -R
DomU with four cpus (each from different core)
 real    6m19.300s
DomU with one cpu
 real 3m32.651s
Dom0
 real    2m37.418s

Did you try a process that was less io intensive? It would be worthwhile
to see if the bottleneck is cpu or io.

what's the best way ? vmstat, iostat or something  else.?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.