[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Other virtualization technologies alongside xen?


  • To: "Rudi Ahlers" <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Andrzej Wolski" <taihen@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 16:13:38 +0200
  • Cc: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 07:14:09 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=uDpi09t5I6nPSugcpHkQUerxytMZgQDAxo0F9vBK6ofutXJ2XWSZvFdqePxGv9PRR+ rF29kSiHuMKZfxGJHaIW3xALuPlTGk6lNmkxy1W6onOX7YiHfiZcrvbxtFFCIgDpAWJA uhAaC/zWNoFjYlFqNRFHPE3Q8+AdXk0OgGXdE=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Andrzej Wolski wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 2:55 AM,  <russ@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Does xen play nice with any other virtualization technologies?  I tried
>>> vmware and virtualbox, but they both crash under the xen kernel.
>>>
>>
>> We have couple servers with xen and openvz. They are doing quite
>> alright next to each other. CentOS5.
>>
>
> Are you saying that you're running an OpenVZ server , with openVZ VM's, in a
> Xern domU? Doesn't  that cause a big network bottleneck, and a NAT headache?

No, no, that would be silly :)

I'm saying that on physical server I have openvz server and xen dom0
_next_ to each other, not on top of each other.

-- 
Andrzej Wolski aka Taihen
mailto/xmpp: taihen@xxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.