[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Two bridges on one host, can not communicate on the second, what did I miss?
Anders,I have a similar working setup on xen 3.1 (dummy interface with 3 bridges and 3 nics on a domU and 2 nics on other 3 domUs) some thoughts: - any filtering on the domUs or dom0 (iptables, ebtables)- do you see mac addresses filling the bridges tables (brctl showmacs <bridgename>)? - check /var/log/xen/- maybe post "ip address list" "brctl show" from dom0 and "ip address list" from domU together with the comment's stripped xend-config and domU config. cheers, Massimo Anders Andersson wrote: Hello! I'm trying to set up an "internal" bridge on a Xen host (xen 3.2, ubuntu server 8.04 as a host). I am trying to get domU A communicate with domU B, with no success. First I followed the instructions in the XenNetworking page on the wiki to get another bridge with no physical interface connected. I created a file called /etc/xen/scripts/network-custom: #!/bin/sh dir=$(dirname "$0") "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=0 "$dir/network-bridge" "$@" vifnum=1 bridge=dmz netdev=dummy0 After a reboot, this bridge comes up fine, and the output from "brctl show" looks like the default bridge that the network-bridge script creates. I have now a pdummy0 interface configured as well, belonging to the bridge, but that is of course expected. After this I create two guests: domU_A and domU_B. They are both on the same network, 10.19.0.0/24, with IP number 10.19.0.2 and 10.19.0.3 respectively. They just have one virtual network interface each, and I added "bridge=dmz" to them, so they will connect to the dmz bridge. After I start up both guests, I can see from "brctl show" that their vif1.0 and vif2.0 have been attached to the dmz bridge, and inside, the network interface has been configured correctly if I look at them using ifconfig. Here is where I fail. They can not access each other through the network, not with ping, nor with anything else. Using netcat gives me some slightly helpful message: domU_B:~# echo hello | nc 10.19.0.2 9999 (UNKNOWN) [10.19.0.2] 9999 (?) : No route to host The output from "route" shows (sorry if the columns are not aligned correctly): Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 10.19.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 I don't have a default gateway, but well, there *is* no gateway, there are just two clients. The "ethtool -K eth0 tx off" trick doesn't make any difference. What's sad here is that networking within the default xen bridge works great, with exactly the same method of creating and I have never had any problems with that. As a matter of fact, keeping the exact same config, but changing the bridge to the default bridge, makes it possible to communicate between the guests. But now I would like to add another bridge, as I would like to learn a little more about networking. Help! What did I miss? How can I find out where the problem is? / Anders _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users -- Massimo Mongardini ~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~ echo 'Jg!J!hjwf!zpv!bo!bqqmf!boe!zpv!hjwf!nf!bo!bqqmf-!uifo!xf!xjmm!ibwf!bo!bqqmf!fbdi/!Cvu!jg!J!hjwf!zpv!bo!jefb!boe!zpv!hjwf!nf!bo!jefb-!xf!xjmm!ibwf!uxp!jefbt!fbdi!' | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge' ~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~ http://massimo.mongardini.it http://www.getthefacts.it http://www.mongardini.it/pizza-howto ~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~-.-~ Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |