[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] VT-d... I think is working?
Hi Daniel, On Friday 18 July 2008, Daniel Kao wrote: > Hi All, > > I haven't tried to pciback a device yet and setup an HVM but finally got > to a point where I think I have VT-d working, but wanted to make sure this > looks right from my "xm dmesg" output: > > (XEN) Intel VT-d has been enabled > > [snip] > > (XEN) xenoprof: Initialization failed. Intel processor model 23 for P6 > class family is not supported (XEN) [VT-D]intel-iommu.c:1204:d32767 > context_context_mapping: nested PCI bridge not supported: bdf = 0:1:0 > sec_bus = 1 sub_bus = 3 (XEN) [VT-D]intel-iommu.c:1226:d32767 > domain_context_mapping:bus2bridge[2].bus != 0 (XEN) > [VT-D]intel-iommu.c:771: iommu_page_fault: iommu->reg = ffff828bfff57000 > (XEN) [VT-D]intel-iommu.c:754: iommu_page_fault:DMA Write: DEVICE 0:2.0 > addr 0 REASON 5 (XEN) print_vtd_entries: domain_id = 7fff bdf = 0:2:0 gmfn > = 0 > (XEN) hg->pgd == NULL > (XEN) AMD IOMMU: Disabled > (XEN) *** LOADING DOMAIN 0 *** > > Only concerns I have are: > > (XEN) xenoprof: Initialization failed. Intel processor model 23 for P6 > class family is not supported That's nothing to do with VT-d, Xenoprof is a profiling app (e.g. for conducting performance analyses, etc). Don't worry about it :-) Cheers, Mark > I have an E8400 on an Intel DQ35JO motherboard and the references to > iommu_page_fault but I think that's just info and nothing else? > For > reference, this is on CentOS 5.2 w/custom Xen kernel I built using CentOS > xen kernel source (2.6.18-92.1.6.el5-xen-x86_64) with Xen 3.2.1 tarball. -- Push Me Pull You - Distributed SCM tool (http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~maw48/pmpu/) _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |