[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] performace of disks


  • To: "Javier Guerra Giraldez" <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Grant McWilliams" <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:36:01 -0700
  • Cc: Fernando Jiménez Solano <fernandojs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Victor Hugo dos Santos <listas.vhs@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 01:36:46 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=hWKK1+SZq2byN/NFz1fKKeGG4FBfOz+NrDCxRbP8cWNJkWTiq68LkDBzRnxwl1Tvoe CJ+XuUXmpzxvCmdmf1xAqIr4wQsUYpmjAElU1Zc7sybhygjRcNeyxJlopTwkWgvCM+yj lRwsWyYlCB97jg5BPs/hAcXzI8bZjv7XA7JCI=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>


On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:41 PM, Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


does the choice of filesystem holding the image files make any difference?

i guess ext3 would be among the best, but only if the data isn't journalled.
also might be nice to add to the OCFS2 - GFS rivalry.

--
Javier

So far OCFS2 and GFS are dog slow in Xen. Normally you take a pretty decent hit when you use any of these over a local filesystem but under Xen the performance hit is unacceptable. If anyone has gotten either to work at a decent pace in Xen I'd like to know the methodology.

Grant

--
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows."
Now they have two problems.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.