[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Debian domU interface naming strangeness


  • To: "Xen users mailing list" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Ray Barnes" <tical.net@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:52:04 -0400
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 14:52:41 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=WPxVFIMoBj/m4pysl/PNeet5kgnflJOryVkIjdyEfpBmXhUwpHOb9xGgAa9/45N4GO Hy/9l3KJyuqK1ObqgFtCOP856QvHWf9MULOVRoDCpZ23v4W953qBsy6bHW0+2KjK+A4j 3HESVpWYgC6/EZrtzf2gf1n6c422fynCmsc5Y=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hi all.  I've got a Debian domU I created from scratch a few weeks
ago.  Every time I rolled it out previously in testing, it worked
fine.  But now it seems to make the ethernet device eth1 rather than
eth0 in the domU:

localhost:~# ifconfig -a
eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:16:3E:3D:A0:30
          BROADCAST MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)

lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
          inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
          UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:16436  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 b)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)

localhost:~# dmesg|grep -i eth
netfront: Initialising virtual ethernet driver.
netfront: device eth0 has flipping receive path.
localhost:~#

Note that as eth1, it routes traffic just fine.  I can ifconfig it up
and set an IP address, then get good routed connectivity.  I'm seeing
this eth1 naming issue on dom0s running CentOS 5.0 with the stock Xen
3.0.3 (yes that means literally 5.0, not a higher minor number), as
well as Cent 5.1 with Xen 3.2.0 compiled from source.  But obviously
it presents a problem since I can't count on consistent naming.

Thoughts?

-Ray

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.