Hi Rob,
Basically there’s 2 reasons why I’m looking at Xen:
1. Cost of licencing for Virtuozzo which is based on how
many CPUs etc.
2. Xen has better IO performance compared to Virtuozzo.
It’s been shown on a few forums that Xen can have 3 times the disk IO
performance.
Does anyone have any answers to my original questions?
Regards,
Alan
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Gingell [mailto:gingell@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, 7 August 2008 5:39 AM
To: Alan Lam
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Xen Setup
Alan wrote:
> I am interested in deploying Xen to replace an
existing Virtuozzo based
> virtual server solution we are currently using.
I'm curious about your shift from Virtuozzo: is that
because you needed
something other than Virtuozzo does? or because Virtuozzo
proved to be
ineffective in some way?
I'm asking because I'm being urged to work with
Virtuozzo, and wanted to
know if there were some pitfalls in using it that were
evident in
people's experiences with it.
Appreciate any thoughts you can share.
