[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] GPL PV drivers for Windows 0.9.11-pre12


  • To: "Joost van den Broek" <jvandenbroek@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:28:57 +1000
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:29:37 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AckHdlY3R7marpehSJ6yhB+Twh98uQAAD/hA
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-users] GPL PV drivers for Windows 0.9.11-pre12

> Ah well, I tested both Large Send enabled and disabled on pre13, but
> didn't disable it on pre12. So the answer would be that there is
indeed
> a problem with the Large Send Offload on my system. Iirc I'm using the
> same system as yours, a ML110 with Broadcom NIC on-board. Based on
your
> test results, this one should work well.

Well my system is an ML115 but probably otherwise identical. I haven't
disabled any large send options at all anywhere to get my
>500mbit/second results on the 1Gbit/second network...

> 
> Strange thing is when I do a xenstore-ls, I get this message back:
> /usr/sbin/xenstore-ls: line 6: /usr/lib/xen-3.2-1/bin/xenstore-ls: No
> such file or directory
> /usr/sbin/xenstore-ls: line 6: exec:
/usr/lib/xen-3.2-1/bin/xenstore-ls:
> cannot execute: No such file or directory
> 
> Looking in /usr/lib/xen-3.2-1/bin, I find many files, including seven
> beginning with xenstore-... But no xenstore-ls. How could that be?

Maybe you need to install 'xenstore-utils'?
# dpkg -S xenstore-ls
xenstore-utils: /usr/bin/xenstore-ls
xen-utils-3.1-1: /usr/lib/xen-3.1-1/bin/xenstore-ls
xen-utils-unstable: /usr/lib/xen-unstable/bin/xenstore-ls

> I'm
> using Xen 3.2.1 on Debian Etch 4.0 with kernel  2.6.18-6-xen-686. This
> is the Etch Xen stock kernel, maybe it needs to be upgraded? What
kernel
> are you running?

I'm using Xen 3.2.something from etch-backports. My kernel is
2.6.18-xen-amd64 which I assume is built from the same source as yours.

> I just tried 'ethtool -k peth0', which says the following: "Cannot get
> device udp large send offload settings: Operation not supported". So I
> suppose that confirms your assumption about the unsupported large send
> offload, but yours, thus the same card, supports it?

That is only udp large send offload. The one you want to notice is 'tcp
segmentation offload', which is 'on' on my system.

James

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.