[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] (no subject)


  • To: "Xen-users" <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "juzi0730" <juzi0730@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 21:03:59 +0800
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 06:04:42 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hi,
 
I have some questions about schedulers in Xen 3.1.0.
 
These days I have performed some experiments to examine the impact of scheduler parameters on the performance application.
But to my surprise, the results are not consistent with some instructions in many papers.
I used the credit scheduler, and two guest domains, one ran an I/O intensive application, and a CPU intensive application ran in another domain. I found that the performance of my i/o intensive application was severely influenced by the cpu intensive domain.
As many documents said, if using the credit scheduler, I/O intensive domain will preempt CPU intensive ones immediately when they become runnable. They will not wait a full time slice. Well, why my i/o intensive application was severely influenced by the CPU intensive domain, the performance was worse obviously?
 
regards,
Sharon
 
2008-08-27

juzi0730
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.