[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen, LVM and snapshots


  • To: "Morten W. Petersen" <morten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Ciro Iriarte" <cyruspy@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 15:26:26 -0400
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:27:07 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=iAJRHGyrncCjV2553awLRRM0M2nUTce/QDoLjRKI7wGQs4HXJ72fiQOYXZgGLS3SBH FcsVTuCdTjfcSdcghA/ko+9lu15EN5Yo4XrtIpzoUns3nU5I2sZ3nNLhmpa5gviCPQ0F 4HkXbdAY/dIWhejm0lHkzWIt4HAlkGx20sW34=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

2008/10/14 Morten W. Petersen <morten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi :)
>
> We're considering using snapshots of LVM logical volumes as a backup
> feature, that is, having domU instances running on each of their own
> logical volume, and then in the dom0, create snapshots and take backups.
>
> Has anyone else tried this?  Is it safe?
>
> I saw an old message from 2006 on this list, where it is said that
> "Common understanding is that LVM2 snapshots are unstable".
>
> Is that still the case?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Morten

Than can be done, but you'll have to stop the domU, take snapshot and
start the domU again...

Regards,
Ciro

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.