[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Re: XEN ans Windows SMP


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Oliver Wilcock" <oliver@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 11:12:03 -0500 (EST)
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:12:51 -0800
  • Importance: Normal
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 08:01:35 -0500
> From: "Venefax" <venefax@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> There is an amazing problem between XEN and Windows 2003 SMP. For
> instance, a 1 CPU Windows VM takes 0.7 percent while running idle, but if
> you add a second CPU, still idle, the percentage shoots up to 3.6%. As a
> result, you can only have a few Windows SMP machines. Is there a solution
> to make the SMP simulation more efficient in XEN?
> Federico

By SMP so you mean you are using a non-ACPI HAL?  (perhaps acpi=0 in your
config?)  Or do you mean you played with the vcpus=2 setting?

CPU AMD 64?
64 bit hypervisor?
32 bit Windows?
Linux distribution and Xen version?

I'm trying to find out why my experience with a 64 bit hypervisor and 32
bit Windows gives such lousy performance (I've seen a few other people
mention it, but I believe most don't have the problem).

When using an ACPI Multiprocessor HAL I see idle CPU usage (xm top) closer
to 112% when vcpus=2 and the DomU guest VM is sluggish.  I'm using SLES 10
SP2 on AMD X2 with ASUS M2N-LR.  I plan to experiment with other CPUs and
kernels when I have a chance.



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.