[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] disk backend performance


  • To: "Xen Users" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Guillaume <guillaume.chardin@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 10:15:32 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Nov 2008 01:16:11 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Xsn288azLxOqgZE4LAsYTtntJdHYdAZnr0JCQfPBVzHPHxTw9WoxhLHpYIRuIoKBKm FivD/4ZIhx23UKDnZJ+BgtHwjcNnkLBMJepOkj0RV9RcvqXfNAWOilR4UZ7PC7VpER5z XLEaoJ47WmaL43FplBAOvPWGHwVLJuke3nyWw=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

hi,

I ask me some questions about xen disk backend performance. What is the better backend to use to have the best ones.

For me I tought its better to use phy: than disk: , because it's does'nt need "encapsulation" to store data in and so, writing data is quicker. But maybe i'm wrong.
Maybe some of you can give advise and more info about that !

Thanks.


--
Guillaume
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.