[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Win2k3 GPLPV Network issue (2)


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Rik v. A" <rikratva@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:25:22 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:26:00 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=VkCOZIfI0k0dj2ORLCjfSxvgpqN/Ic+x+7j8Gbddz0YoSkjyOV0FdeSmARUQX/4wg/ Uh3JFm/OkhgGVtUVLbrrz8Ij+JLXsKc07AbSQs/4xG+v+ue/hEj26UmI1JsUGYQ2I6E4 DTQcXw36vHwLk9ncw22fGHa8O1gJk0I2Tz1Mk=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Hi Nick,

I am using the latest drivers: 0.9.12-pre13. Service Pack 2 is installed.

Kind regards,
Rik


2009/1/6 Nick Couchman <Nick.Couchman@xxxxxxxxx>:
> Could you specify what version of the GPL PV drivers you're using, and what
> Windows 2003 service pack you have installed?
>
> -Nick
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rik v. A <rikratva@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-users] Win2k3 GPLPV Network issue (2)
> Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 15:43:57 +0100
>
> Sorry for the previous unfinished E-mail. I managed to send it already
> using a weird Gmail key combination...
>
> Hi. I am running Windows 2003 Server with James' excellent GPLPV
> drivers. They significantly boosted the network throughput (I get
> around 600 Mbit using iperf).
> However, I am having some trouble with the ethernet. We are using an
> accounting application that uses Samba shares to store it's (database)
> data. It is very poorly written, and since I moved from a physical
> Win2k machine to a Xen-based Win2k3 machine, it keeps crashing. I
> thought that it was just due the poor quality of the software, but
> since I have started using Bacula for the backups, I suspect the
> network drivers. Bacula fails almost every backup job (Connection
> reset by peer) to the two Win2k3 machines running on the same Xen
> server. It has no problems backing up other (physical) machines.
>
> I tested the packet loss using Iperf UDP tests, and as soon as I
> increase the bandwidth, I get packet loss values up to 39%.
>
> I also run a paravirtual Linux guest on this same Xen server that
> doesn't suffer from this packet loss.
>
> Is there something I can do?
>
> Kind regards,
> Rik
>
>
> ________________________________
> This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole
> use of the intended recipient. If this email is not intended for you, or you
> are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended
> recipient, please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering
> (SEAKR) Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you are strictly
> prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using
> this message, its contents or attachments in any way. If you have received
> this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
> e-mail and delete the message from your mailbox. Information contained in
> this message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither
> endorsed by nor attributable to SEAKR.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.