[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] RE: Xen 3 Bonding VLAN issue


  • To: Thomas Menard <TMenard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Muhammad Atif <m_atif_s@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:45:25 -0800 (PST)
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:46:27 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=M6p1nzIPKVgxxrqA8Vkrd2Td/wU2sR3oeGUQyew24GGTyh7R5JMyuzXK2QOZR5uDFcFyYEHCoIn0wIPvLTIhpa2K67VRwZdmAjy2g+mgf0fsYgnM+/Lly0o5+J9K4ThUt9YSMJBU2y7WNdsCHGLBfDW61UNJ42mADEJn3+PSb2c=;
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

You figure is not  that clear to me. From what I see is that you are trying to bond (call it bond0) eth0 and eth1 at dom0. And then you create a xenbr with bond0. On domU you wish to create another bond using eth0 and eth1.  From what I see from your figure you are providing domU with eth0 and eth1 from same XenBr????

I am not the best of the judges as your case can be different, but this arrangement is kinda dodgey. You will not see any gain in bandwidth or fault tolerance in domU.  If fault tolerance is what you are after, providing domU with only one NIC (eth0) is sufficient with your arrangement. If thats the bandwidth you are after then good luck, because I am yet to see anyone actually benefitting from link aggregation for domU using similar mechanism. (that includes me as well).


 
Best Regards,
Muhammad Atif



From: Thomas Menard <TMenard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 8, 2009 11:05:52 PM
Subject: [Xen-users] RE: Xen 3 Bonding VLAN issue

Hi

Nobody to help me please ?

 

I’m totally stuck and I don’t find any help on my problem.

 

De : xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Thomas Menard
Envoyé : mercredi 7 janvier 2009 15:42
À : xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : [Xen-users] Xen 3 Bonding VLAN issue

 

Hi

I’m working on the implementation on XEN in my company, I’ve got a strange issue.

 

I’ve installed a CentOS 5.2 x86_64 Xen server on a Dell PowerEdge 1955 Server.

 

We use automated installation trough home made scripts (more than 150 servers and keep growing fast), we use this architecture :

 

 

dom0                                                                                  domU

Eth0--------------

                               |             |------xenbr0-------------------eth0------

                               |             |                                             |                             |

                               |             |                                             |                             |-----bond0----bond0.11

                               |-----bond0---bond0.11               |-----eth1-------|             |--------bond0.120

                               |             |------bond0.120

Eth1--------------

 

We try to do the same on domU on PE 1955 but only the native VLAN (bond0) can go trough.

 

We use 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5xen kernel  with Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708S Gigabit Ethernet (rev 12) nic cards.

 

I’ve saw on the internet that this may be an issue with the driver included with the kernel, I’ve rebuilt the driver picked from Broadcom site and it still the same issue.

 

If anyone can help me with that thx

 

Thomas


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.