|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Recent Dom0 kernel
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Am 25.01.2009 um 19:22 schrieb Bastian Blank: On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:03:23AM +0100, Paul Schulze wrote: Basically, yes, if you consider the Xen part of the Novell linux-2.6.27-xen.hg tree as _huge_. Please understand, that I did not try to just patch the Ubuntu Intrepid Diffs into that tree. Also note, that I tried to use the linux-2.6.27-xen.hg tree itself, without any patching and I got the same results. So my approach to the whole thing seems to be working, but the resulting kernel is not, in both cases.
I know, I already had the Debian source package (as I stated), but there is a truck load of patches in them and some depend on others, so the better question here would have been, if someone has a hint for me on which patches I would actually need to apply to a vanilla kernel in order to get Xen support. At the moment, I am trying a different approach to determine, what I need, but a hint would still be helpful, since it is going rather slow. There are many reasons, hardware support and security mostly.No. RHEL is both security supported and they add new (server) hardware support. Please don't assume, I am using server hardware, just because I am running a server, there is half-decent hardware out there, that doesn't say "Server" on the package as well as the all important price tag. I have tried the XenLinux tree before on another system and I had trouble with hardware support, so it is my very last resort (if even).
Well, I've done alot of stuff by myself, so this won't get me down. Or in other words, I am not as new to Linux as you might think (though for whatever reason, my first post might have given you that impression).
>Reading package lists... Done >Building dependency tree >Reading state information... Done >E: Couldn't find package linux-image-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64Ubuntu Hardy (main, universe, multiverse, backports) with Xen 3.3, remember? Additional repositories might be ok, but mixing Ubuntu and Debian main repositories is kinda dangerous, don't you think ;) ?. And yes, there is a Xen kernel available, its just a little older (Xen 3.2) with no more recent Xen kernel in the Intrepid release, so no PvSCSI and with CONFIG_XEN_PCIDEV_BACKEND_VPCI set as the PCI passthrough backend. Ah, and stop top-posting. Only if you say "please" :) . And thanks, rethink the whole thing just got me a new idea. Paul. - -- Paul Schulze Mail: avlex gmx net ($1@$2.$3) Public Key: http://solaris-net.dyndns.org/keys/key_avlex.asc "Making mistakes is human, but to really screw things up, you need Computers" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFJfM3+YDWOGtiChoARAgrZAJ0d88LgUBZ0DrTVE+o5IijYPJOPYgCeIo+O lMx9xZoNTtDI1my0eJLKxgY= =vMYL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |