[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] I want to know if.....


  • From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:01:46 +0800
  • Cc: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:02:35 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=goirand.fr; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=postfix; b= sxKzSHtWo4C7tQCMT4TYV0dSJ8PNjnlUUEEJ/AgVKP7cXt1dHjUvGeSximF/ntf3 UO2onRAz4/uZvouBVccWJlCEtEnBM51737YMHXOvhWo4Tb+6lJln4sogkeel8I7e 21w9ep/65MqfuyGvnad2SbZRdmbmP0/E3bYZ9+ZiHYQ=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Openpgp: id=98EF9A49

Mauro wrote:
> xen is no more developed?
> I've heard that xen is no more developed and kvm is more considered by users.

It seems like KVM developers and other folks hate Xen, and spit on it as
much as they can. I don't understand why, but that's really not right.

I have seen a stupid blog entry saying things like "Xen will never be a
part of the Kernel", as if the userland tools for KVM would.

Just don't listen to the noise, and have a look to how many patch a WEEK
are sent to the xen-devel list. It's HUGE, and quite hard to follow.

Now, RedHat may do whatever they want, I don't really care.

Thomas


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.