[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] scp performance from machine to guest


  • To: Javier Guerra <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Zach Moazeni <zach.lists@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:46:19 -0500
  • Cc: xen-users list <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:45:54 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:in-reply-to:subject:references:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:date:cc:x-mailer; b=GdHqUynUksjLbQ2ee45ajRm1xk6Yn9vSckM183/bEd5v58bmdbFoPnBlRGWa++NwW6 C1GcYE3BYXspMzVz4G5UhFBkYdPCBUrduI5g8BV1KLZc0h0Xp61rI9nBUVdlWfBg+/jx Fqi7DIpU+mZNWoAsFI0u6KnT+hvkYOUaxvJ2s=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>


On Mar 2, 2009, at 3:36 PM, Javier Guerra wrote:

On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Zach Moazeni <zach.lists@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Can you guys lend any insight to this?

resource contention is far more a limiting factor than bandwidth in Xen.

IOW: both Dom0 and DomU were fighting for some resource, either drive
heads or (more likely) CPU time.

Ahh interesting. I didn't think of that.

Thanks for the quick response Javier!

-Zach

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.