[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Xen origins and time line (Was: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen and gnu gpl)


  • To: Patrick Archibal <bugpb60@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Todd Deshane <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:17:29 -0400
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 18:18:08 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=K0UPqHqinrtNaFCwmjC+pcoNI3kx/9o/4hz/J0LIOwlCNgWS5iMA6IKxEnO6y6CWFx Fognbf3MmZuIRwc7eZwaeyAwe17YvSU4V0Uc2IFxQZK6OQks8re0edDcm82flRpXuLHc Vnom7Knw1N4uMnJcVLQGj8VU2Q2Lfgpdplx6I=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Patrick Archibal <bugpb60@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In first, thanks for all these informations.
>
> It seems you have a good knowledge of xen. Maybe, you know big mile stone of
> the project ??
> I have just two date : :o(
> 2003 --> creation of xen
> 2005-- > xen support virtualisation like intel vt et amd pacifica
> I dont have more informations. I'm looking for six or seven milestone for my
> study ?
> Do you have more informations about that ?
>

http://books.google.com/books?id=XS-Jj7s2nhYC&pg=PA15&dq=running+xen+timeline&ei=Kb61SaaxLYz2MJ6z-eML#PPA15,M1

Cheers,
Todd

> Thanks
> Best regards
> Patrick
>
>
>> From: mark.williamson@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen and gnu gpl
>> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 18:15:11 +0000
>> CC: chris.ace@xxxxxxx
>>
>> On Monday 09 March 2009 10:02:34 Christian Tramnitz wrote:
>> > Im not an lawyer either but I think this has nothing to do with "derived
>> > work" and/or kernel vs. userspace but rather with the second answer: the
>> > fact that Citrix owns Xen and releases it (kind of) using different
>> > licenses, for a more detailed explanation see:
>> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dual-licensing
>>
>> Well, I mentioned that possibility for completeness but the reason that I
>> think "derived works" vs "mere aggregation" is important is that Citrix
>> actually do not own the copyrights on all of Xen. Some of the code in the
>> hypervisor comes from Linux, for instance. Some of it comes from external
>> contributors.
>>
>> They did actually rewrite much of the userspace tools (Xend, XenStored)
>> themselves for their closed-source product - therefore they hold all the
>> copyrights on those tools - but the hypervisor they use is still GPL and
>> can't
>> easily / practically be closed off, even if they wanted to do that.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Mark
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-users mailing list
>> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
> ________________________________
> Votre correspondant a choisi Hotmail et profite d'un stockage quasiment
> illimité. Créez un compte Hotmail gratuitement !
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>



-- 
Todd Deshane
http://todddeshane.net
http://runningxen.com

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.