[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Qcow utilities


  • To: Xen List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:02:50 +0700
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:03:30 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Joe Hammerman <jhammerman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hey all, as a follow up to my earlier communication, it seemed that qcow
> might have the functionality I was looking for. I spent some time trying to
> get it up and going, but wasn’t making much progress.

> Given

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479315

> Does this mean that CoW is broken on CentOS 5.3 with Xen 3.03?

Seems like it.
What are your main goals?
If it's space savings, IMHO usually it's not worthed. For example,
once you do "yum update" on domU and update lots of packages (for
example going from Centos 5.2 -> 5.3), it pretty much destroys
whatever space-saving you may have while still having the performace
penalty of qcow.

This is part of the reason I like zfs volume, either directly on
Opensolaris dom0 or by exporting it (via iscsi) to Linux dom0. zfs
snapshot-clone feature is very efficient, and even in the event of
domU's data change a lot (like the above scenario) you can still have
space savings by turning on compression and setting refreservation=0.

Regards,

Fajar

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.