Xen project Mailing List

Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen 3.4.0 released!

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

From: Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro <thiagocmartinsc@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 22:23:14 -0300

Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Delivery-date: Mon, 18 May 2009 18:24:02 -0700

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=U6ESSgd1N3P5WHVJSDRhVVKWJ6tv+xyjAWh51y78YmusqMw7E4lQE9eCAYYPKatu6W Wz0EkeEyZaGxxFlqlBJm75p9MvEZS2VmWH7Bqbz51M3+BDBDekQ2bdFey8F3iIMsVidc 5WZesQoJSJQ94zsaizs7UWn9XX8yGH/ZpdDeU=

List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

2009/5/18 Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

It's easily forgotten since developers don't read the README. It's fixed in
the 3.4-testing repository now, which is the main place to grab 3.4 bits
from.

-- Keir

On 18/05/2009 09:44, "Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro"

<thiagocmartinsc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Sorry to ask but, why this kind of update doesn't be there before the major
> release to the public?
>
> It's ugly to see stuff like that, it seems an incomplete release, or hurriedly
> done, even if it wasn't.
>
> However, the Xen is amazing! Thanks for the software!
>
> -
> Thiago
>
> 2009/5/18 Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Thiago Camargo Martins Cordeiro writes ("Re: [Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel]
>> [ANNOUNCE] Xen 3.4.0 released!"):
>>> I can see the Linux 2.6.18 within the xen-3.4 sources! :-P
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>>> But the README says it's Xen-3.3...
>>
>> Which README ? Oh, xen-3.4.0/README. Ooops. That file is maintained
>> in xen-3.4-testing.hg and really ought to be updated there.
>>
>> Ian.
>
>

_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users