[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Difference performances between HVM and PV guest in hard disc reading


  • To: xen list <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: helicoterus-elih@xxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 12:25:40 +0000 (GMT)
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 24 May 2009 05:26:18 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.it; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=P5WdgPFXIeYSf0Bf/XndKlBTk0lnWl8Zx8JiBxw0YKr0HzgSQeS+Uvy8cuCU/gvs0bsL++/GljcdLYRK4nafQftGm84N+2VBmMsUVaGJR52Q6ZHZriLvGKMxDYLjx+JI4pq3aJaCuIanHZRzRI2LY7BcNfiprUC7e/og31puPZk=;
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

I perform some tests to get hard disc performance differences between HVM domU 
and a paravirtualized one (both Debian Lenny).
I used hdparm ( option -t and -T) to test cache of disc and disc sequential 
read.
Syntax is:
hdparm -t|-T /dev/hda1

hdparm -t for hvm returns about 30 MB/sec, wheras hdparm -t for PV return about 
180 MB/sec.
hdparm -T for hvm returns about 1247 MB/sec, wheras hdparm -T for PV return 
about 1183 MB/sec.

Are this test true? What about this differences? Why are hard disc performances 
so different?

Thanks





_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.