[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-users] Screen resolution - Vista
I've always favored RDP for everything post-setup/console, as using the Xen implementation of VNC seems to usually create significant CPU load on the Dom0. If you must use VNC, install VNCserver on the DomU itself, and the load issue disappears. Best Regards Nathan Eisenberg Sr. Systems Administrator Atlas Networks, LLC support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://support.atlasnetworks.us/portal -----Original Message----- From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Haxby Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 9:45 AM To: Trolle Selander Cc: Nicolas Michel; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Screen resolution - Vista Trolle Selander wrote: > On current Xen, with stdvga=1 & videoram=16, resolutions up to > 2048x1536x32 are possible. There's never been any 800x600 "hardcoding" > for HVM guests in regular xen - even with the cirrus model, > resolutions up to 1280x1024 are available. If the resoltion in Vista > is "locked" to 800x600, that must be some distro-specific tweak. You're right, of course -- I had got confused with the pv vnc framebuffer. Again :-) > All that said, the RDP suggestion is probably a better way to access > the guest in any case. You generally get rather better performance that way although there are odd cases where network connectivity will conspire against you (mostly when you have a separate management LAN). jch _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |