[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] Kernel compile question


  • To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Ian Tobin" <itobin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:22:49 +0100
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:24:44 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcnqdeUb5rQH6soaRDOAwAudHaM7GgAAEMXA
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Kernel compile question

Thanks for that :)

Ian


-----Original Message-----
From: Fajar A. Nugraha [mailto:fajar@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 11 June 2009 10:21
To: Ian Tobin
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Kernel compile question

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Ian Tobin<itobin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I was just wondering when compiling the kernel is it best to do the
bits as
> modules or built-in ?

It depends :)

Some xen-hosting providers only allow users to only use their kernel.
If you're one of those hosting providers, then you'd want to compile
everyting built-in. If you want to put kernel on dom0, you'd probably
want to go this route.

Some distro maintainers (e.g. Redhat) opt for
almost-everyting-is-a-module. One of the reasons is to avoid wasting
memory from unused drivers. If you want to user kernel on domU (loaded
with pygrub), you'd probably want to go this route.

-- 
Fajar



_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.