[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] xvda vs sda -performance-


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: fmb fmb <feedmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:48:13 +0300
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:48:59 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=PEU9h7HCqAZKblVD8UJBWDLd5aa2gPNcRBgZCWDfNKX/FF4E777YK8n9qfV9gqLwMn Ne7m4O0tvEKt8sFzKyD6jJ5cPB8onbZ6uaTQn7YTggwEHVgMiZPrHP689U6S4pBQpSOT 9ZoPmiSuNCeG/iBLUmtBfepKrE2vCh9scg3gE=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Is it still advisable to use xvda instead of sda in the fstab and cfg files?

When I check the guest OS

[root@localhost ~]# fdisk -l

Disk /dev/xvda1: 1073 MB, 1073741824 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 130 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Disk /dev/xvda1 doesn't contain a valid partition table

Disk /dev/xvda2: 268 MB, 268435456 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 32 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table
[root@localhost ~]#

Is this "Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table" normal?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.