[Xen-users] xvda vs sda -performance-

[fmb fmb <feedmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Is it still advisable to use xvda instead of sda in the fstab and cfg files?

When I check the guest OS

[root@localhost ~]# fdisk -l

Disk /dev/xvda1: 1073 MB, 1073741824 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 130 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Disk /dev/xvda1 doesn't contain a valid partition table

Disk /dev/xvda2: 268 MB, 268435456 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 32 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table
[root@localhost ~]# 

Is this "Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table" normal?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users