[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-users] Xen 4.0 feature request
> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users- > bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nathan Eisenberg > Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 1:31 PM > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Xen 4.0 feature request > > More than thinking that it is possible, I do it every single day. It works, and it works > well. :) > > There's no reason not to have dedicated Logical Volumes for every domU. It makes > dealing with the data backend a lot easier, as the volume management becomes > incredibly logical and well labeled. Definitely. In fact one of our volume groups has 55 LV's: # vgs VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree t0core 1 55 0 wz--nc 4.08T 3.63T This is a clustered LVM too, shared among 4 dom0 hosts. You could accomplish the same creating as many LUNs on your SAN, but it tends to be more work and the volume labels are not as clear. The only advantage I see is that you won't have to work around the limitations of a CLVM (e.g. single-host snapshots). (It'd be nice too if the Xen tools handled automatic LV activation/deactivation when bringing up a domU or migrating.) -Jeff _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |