[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Re: xen benchmark results on nehalem
- To: Luke S Crawford <lsc@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Grant McWilliams <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:25:58 -0700
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ozgur Akan <ozgurakan@xxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:27:05 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=GKk2bejXMZiJ+KtTCHTKzs1COvDDozbrZ+gQG8kFWUGNCZ2DU2GUDnycLA7VkmhW+k 5qmmKpJvz+9hkeytrVQ09JCYE6z/ldoIFFwJxvB+DPVs2hqYSZOLI7YkQb2xjsi4UCEX 6OGFaFoXL1Ad74UiHprY4aY2QG0FXNQonLk6g=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Luke S Crawford <lsc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've found in most webapp workloads, the amount of ram matters more
than anything else; I mean, until you cache all your regularly accessed
data, and my experience has been that most people tend to overbuy CPU
and skimp on the ram.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
According to these tests having more ram was even slower. Anyone want to comment as to why?
Grant McWilliams
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
