[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] xen and SAN.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Nick Couchman <Nick.Couchman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I'm not sure I buy that...if FC were dead, companies would not still be > developing technologies based upon it...like 8Gb/s FC, which is alive and > well. The major server manufacturers also still offer their servers - 1U, > 2U, blade, etc. - with FC HBAs. Cisco is still building, selling, and > supporting FC switches. FC is far from dead. Furthermore, even on 10Gb (not > GB, Gb) iSCSI still has higher latency and higher overhead than FC, so even > if your throughput is lower (even much lower), depending on the types of > files you're using on those FC connections FC may actually yield better > performance than 10Gb iSCSI. Just my two bits... right after world peace, my big wish would be to have InfiniBand everywhere for storage... -- Javier _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |