[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Creating a paravirtualized guest with Xen 3.4.1 and Centos 5.3 (64bit)
I think your problem is the lack of xenblk/xennet drivers. Try `cp -pr /lib/modules` to your target VM. I think then you'll be able to boot. -Andrew Martin Tröster wrote: Hi, I have a set of 32bit HVM images running fine under Xen 3.2.1 and Xen 3.4.1. Due to performance issues with the fully virtualized setup, I would like to migrate one of those images to a paravirtualized image to compare the network performance. As I do not have a Xen-aware kernel for that VM, I thought the best would be to provide one from outside. Sounds like an easy task, doesn't it? ;-) However, I fail miserably on this task. It just does not work. To get rid of any side effects, I thought it would be nice to try with a known-working image. Therefore I got the image Centos 5.3 image from http://stacklet.com/downloads/images/centos/5.3. And voila, using the pygrub version works like a charm - I can either log in using xm console, or ssh. This is the config used: bootloader = "/usr/bin/pygrub" memory = 256 name = "centos_pygrub" vif = [ 'bridge=eth0,mac=02:00:00:00:01:86' ] disk = ['file:image,sda1,w'] root = "/dev/sda1" extra = "fastboot" Now, as this kernel appears to be working fine, I thought I'd like to just take this kernel and initrd out of the known-good vm, and give it to Xen as parameters. In my naive thinking, this should be the very same as pygrub is doing - loading the kernel specified in /boot/grub.conf with initrd and parameters (all taken from the VM running fine with pygrub): kernel = "vmlinuz" initrd = "initrd" extra = "console=xvc0" root = "/dev/sda1" memory = 256 name = "centos_pv" vif = [ 'bridge=eth0,mac=02:00:00:00:01:86' ] disk = ['file:image,sda1,w'] BUT - this fails! The last lines on the command line are: XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/vbd/2048 XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/vif/0 XENBUS: Device with no driver: device/console/0 md: Autodetecting RAID arrays. md: autorun ... md: ... autorun DONE. VFS: Cannot open root device "sda1" or unknown-block(0,0) Please append a correct "root=" boot option Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0,0) The only obvious difference compared to the previous VM is the line stating "md: autodetecting RAID arrays.". But why should this very same kernel, that initializes fine when using pygrub, now start setting up raid configs? I don't seem to get it, so I really appreciate some help here, I already spent too long debugging this, I have no idea what goes wrong here. Does my host config have anything to do with it (yes, it has a raid)? But if yes, why would it? I did not build the initrd image myself, it's the one taken from the VM which booted fine using pygrub... Thanks a lot! Regards, Martin P.S.: The Xen log does not show any error at all, only reports the VM having crashed. P.P.S.: When I get this running (there's still hope left...), I would like to understand what's the best option to provide a disk - is it tap:aio, or file? Any documentation on reasons to choose either the one or the other? ________________________________________________________________ Neu: WEB.DE Doppel-FLAT mit Internet-Flatrate + Telefon-Flatrate für nur 19,99 Euro/mtl.!* http://produkte.web.de/go/02/ _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |