Re: [Xen-users] does anyone actually use 'on_crash'?

[Steve Wray <steve.wray@xxxxxxxxx>]

Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 08:27:10AM +1300, Steve Wray wrote:
> > Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 10:11:24AM +1300, Steve Wray wrote:
> > > > see subject line
> > > Yes, I do, for debugging.
> > >
> > > on_crash="preserve"
> > >
> > > It enables to make the crashed guests stay there, so you can use for
> > > example "xenctx" to get a stack trace from a crashed guest for
> > > debugging.
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Its just that I've had some issues with on_crash and had posted some 
> > questions and logfile snippets to this list but all I hear are crickets.
> > I've been wondering if this feature is actually supported in any way or if 
> > its deprecated.
> I've been using it, and it works OK.
> I haven't seen anything about it being deprecated.
Thanks for the reassurance.

I had been using 'on_crash = restart' and had seen events in the logs where 
 Xen had tried to do this, but on trying to restart, it complained that a 
domain of that name already existed. When I checked, the domain was not 
running.

--
Please remember that an email is just like a postcard; it is not 
confidential nor private nor secure and can be read by many other people 
than the intended recipient. A postcard can be read by anyone at the mail 
sorting office and expecting what is written on it to be private and secret 
is not realistic. Please hold no higher expectation of email.
If you need to send confidential information in an email you need to use 
encryption. PGP is Pretty good for this.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users