[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] rebased openSUSE dom0 xen patches for 2.6.31 , 2.6.31.8 xenified seems to work stable


  • To: Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:36:47 -0800 (PST)
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 04:38:44 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IpalQC4C7o3gLFf6uhRyPYSWfVytDXvNOfp0IQ7cKJWsopyvcL/UrmV7PD8XqFwlpI/hChEvE599nAVwpX/ckQEKP5xnVVhSoz4rjGPW6gHyTlgcYU+ahVNeHakmXi7DUn3Zo7E+9/Zhv4Gox/O3Ohc7Zu4jgO60yrf7LHMaKn0=;
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>


Xenified 2.6.31.8 via Andy's rebased patches per openSUSE  under Xen 3.4.2 on top of Ubuntu 9.04 Server
handles complete install F12 PV DomU (with ext4 for boot fs, Xen 3.4.2 patched per MRJ ) on phy:/dev/sda7 device.
Compare with     https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553690

Boris.


>
>
> From: Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: xen-users List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thu, December 17, 2009 11:34:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [Xen-users] rebased openSUSE dom0 xen patches for 2.6.31
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:00 AM, Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have uploaded a new set of rebased openSUSE dom0 xen patches and
>>> Gentoo ebuild for 2.6.31 to
>>> http://code.google.com/p/gentoo-xen-kernel/downloads/list
>>
>> Andrew, which kernel do you use as base? I tried appying it to vanilla
>> 2.6.31 and 2.6.31.8, it failed to apply cleanly
>>
>
> The patches will apply to 2.6.31.7 or 2.6.31.8, you need to apply them
> with -p1 and In numeric order, I just used a simple loop to test that
> they apply cleanly:
>
> linux-2.6.31 # patch -p1 -s -i
> /home/andy/patches.kernel.org/patch-2.6.31.7-8
> ubermicro linux-2.6.31 # mkdir xenpatch
> ubermicro linux-2.6.31 # cd xenpatch
> ubermicro xenpatch # tar jxf /home/distfiles/xen-patches-2.6.31-9.tar.bz2
> ubermicro xenpatch # cd ..
> ubermicro linux-2.6.31 # ls xenpatch/ | sort | while read file ; do
> patch -p1 -s -i xenpatch/$file  ; done
>
> No errors, you must be doing something wrong.
>
> Andy
>
>> patching file drivers/net/sfc/sfc_resource/vi_resource_manager.c
>> patching file drivers/net/sfc/Kconfig
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 12.
>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>> drivers/net/sfc/Kconfig.rej
>> patching file drivers/net/sfc/Makefile
>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1.
>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>> drivers/net/sfc/Makefile.rej
>> can't find file to patch at input line 19488
>> Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>> The text leading up to this was:
>> --------------------------
>> |--- head-2009-07-28.orig/drivers/net/sfc/driverlink.c  2009-07-28
>> 10:04:25.000000000 +0200
>> |+++ head-2009-07-28/drivers/net/sfc/driverlink.c       2009-07-28
>> 10:05:40.000000000 +0200
>> --------------------------
>>
>>
>> .... and lots more like that.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Fajar
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
>

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.