[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] can Xen coexist/cooperate with a windows/linux dual-boot system?
- To: Nick Couchman <Nick.Couchman@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: chris <tknchris@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 14:41:06 -0500
- Cc: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>, richard heade <richard.heade@xxxxxxxxx>, Xen User-List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 11:41:54 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=CNs+IN3jaTGqixTIcBagpl020EYJuEi4SYIsYW8cbxQ1IbIulhY/61vZmelRej+rL5 eR/peAiSLgJH1WoxGdgAMy7Bn9DUosTom78Wm75GFW2qj3n6FRH5IpztmHsWX4hP2ggP YXlorkFHjQ5dFHW5N2ck909xnZLmx5J20Fbow=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
I've read about the enlightened mode before but poking around in
windows I wasn't able to find it. Is it in all versions of server 2008
or just certain editions? What if anything needs to be done to activate
this? How does it compare to gplpv? I'd be curious to play around with
it but haven't found any specifics.
Chris
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Nick Couchman <Nick.Couchman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> On 2009/12/27 at 20:22, "Fajar A. Nugraha" < fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 9:34 AM, richard heade < richard.heade@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> thanks for the response, but it leaves me wondering what's the point of
>> full virtualization.
>
> Let's see ... hardware consolidation? cloud computing? hosted vps?
I think the question, more specifically, is why use full virutalization (HVM) instead of paravirtualization? The answers you gave apply to the question, "Why use virtualization at all?" However, as far as Full vs. Para, the answer is that Paravirtualization is much more efficient in resource utilization, but full virtualization allows for running operating systems that are not "aware" of the fact that they are virtualized or are not compatible with Xen's idea of paravirtualization.
>
>> I can install the tweaked OS for
>> paravirtualization, or I can tweak the hardware configuration for an
>> already installed OS for full virtualization. Either way I can't go
>> back to the original OS when I, as occasionally happens, get my linux
>> system hosed up.
>
> That's because you use windows. Seriously.
> You should ask MS if they provide a solution for what you're trying to
> achieve, but I doubt you'd get satisfactory response even with their
> Hyper-V.
Ha! I'd love to see Microsoft provide a Xen-compatible PV kernel, but I'm not holding my breath - I can see them only doing this in a Hyper-V world, but I think "enlightened" Windows essentially already does this. Unfortunately it isn't a true PV kernel, which means you still need HVM support for Xen.
-Nick
--------
This e-mail may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If this email is not intended for you, or you are not responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended recipient, please note that this message may contain SEAKR Engineering (SEAKR) Privileged/Proprietary Information. In such a case, you are strictly prohibited from downloading, photocopying, distributing or otherwise using this message, its contents or attachments in any way. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this e-mail and delete the message from your mailbox. Information contained in this message that does not relate to the business of SEAKR is neither endorsed by nor attributable to SEAKR.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|