[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] amd-v -- passthrough supported?


  • To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>
  • From: 0bo0 <0.bugs.only.0@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:51:57 -0800
  • Cc: Xen User-List <Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:52:36 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DhQqzcX+U6gqZKFb749XQjHg5NMKLqHrUFB1L0noSUys6gqUywr8qbfGJ7p6ZEU7QS uvp3jOH3eLEmrD4RmbXjtmxtw+IsHZ7puitmCMNHeTQxMxrYpxYXViwl/NlfeI7zYNC3 GDqL1gzq8Us7Lls1oVgc9MeZaA9ryhBNRxz1I=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm not sure if AMD even has IOMMU capable hardware out yet?
>
> I think recently there was a patch to enable AMD IOMMU with Xen,
> on "800" series chipsets.

i'm drowning in acronyms and lack of documentation ...

let's try this:

does Xen support whatever AMD cpus/chipsets DO have, that i'm
currently using to successfully do pci-passthrough (which that wiki
page seems to be about) to PV'd DomUs?

I keep being told "The VT-d specification states that all conventional
PCI devices behind a PCIe-to-PCI bridge have to be assigned to the
same domain." and to "refer to the VT-d" spec, but I'm not ON Intel,
don't HAVE Vt-d, etc etc.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.