[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts


  • To: francisco javier funes nieto <esencia@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Rudi Ahlers <Rudi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:30:14 +0200
  • Cc: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 05:31:23 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=softdux.com; h=MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type:X-Assp-Whitelisted:X-Assp-Envelope-From:X-Assp-Intended-For:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir; b=PBHseeYotqNoq86W3wqRp5YNzKSlm2LhlCHiIZdK+YqPhMjq0PWe7AwfPPg/dNCpsSXKqZZqXO+49Oa+gRyLq7jeCQuKAxEaGGLJKrOyuj8wWVP9+P08NYtQuyff8HjN;
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>



On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:06 PM, francisco javier funes nieto <esencia@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You can use Bacula too (for a complete backup solution) with encrypted
communication provided by TLS.

It's a great piece of software! I've worked with it since 1.38 version.

http://www.bacula.org
http://bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Bacula_TLS_Communications.html




I don't want to replace the backup system I have on the clients. My question is rather related to the type of remote system I backup to, and in terms of speed / reliability / security. 

The server has RAID, and will be rsynced to a 2nd backup server, so that's not my concern either. 




--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.