[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-users] Re: rebased Xen kernel patches for 2.6.32
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 09:37:54PM +0000, Andrew Lyon wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:52:16PM +0000, Andrew Lyon wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Hello, > >> > > >> > Andy: Have you planned to release rebased patched against kernel.org > >> > 2.6.32 kernel? > >> > > >> > Debian folks are going to release their next release with 2.6.32 kernel, > >> > and they're looking for patches.. > >> > > >> > OpenSUSE kotd seems to have patches available.. > >> > > >> > -- Pasi > >> > > >> > > >> > >> Hi Pasi, > >> > >> I've not looked at 2.6.32 yet, I wanted to make absolutely sure that > >> the problems with 2.6.31 were fixed before I try .32 as I plan to drop > >> the 2.6.29 ebuild at the same time as releasing the final 2.6.31 > >> ebuild (which will be 2.6.31.12), .31 seems to be rock solid since Jan > >> fixed the swiotlb problem. > >> > >> I might have time next week, its quite a simple process to cherry pick > >> the minimal set of openSUSE patches and adjust them to apply to > >> vanilla, actually going through all of the patches and reviewing them > >> would be a huge task!, I feel guilty when people thank me for the > >> effort as its 99.9% Jan's work and 0.1% my own, but I guess it saves > >> people some effort and increases the volume of testing that the > >> patches receive. > >> > >> By the way they now have a gitorious mirror so there is no need to > >> download rpm's and extract the patches from them. > >> > >> http://gitorious.org/opensuse/kernel-source/commits/master > >> > > > > Hello again, > > > > Now that pv_ops dom0 is getting close to being 'ready' for 2.6.32, > > it would be nice to have xenlinux patches for 2.6.32 aswell.. :) > > > > I'm planning to compare and benchmark against each other.. > > > > I can give the novell patches a go myself, but always easier if someone > > who already knows the stuff does it.. > > > > I'm probably going to do some tests/benchmarks next week if all goes well. > > > > -- Pasi > > > > > > Hi Pasi, > > I don't think there is much point in rebasing the novell/suse patches > for 2.6.32 because they already moved on to 2.6.33, I chose to put > some effort into 2.6.31 because it is the kernel used for opensuse > 11.2 and is therefore maintained for a longer period of time, in fact > it has recently been updated so I will be doing some testing in the > next few days and releasing a updated set of patches for 2.6.31.12. > Ok. > I am still learning C and while I can fix simple bugs I really > struggle with anything more difficult than that, Jan does all the hard > work. > > You could identify the point at which their git tree moved on from > 2.6.32 by accessing the mirror at > http://www.gitorious.org/opensuse/kernel-source and then pull the > patches at that revision, but if there are any issues with the kernel > it is doubtful that Jan would be interested unless the issue affects > 2.6.33/head as well. > Yeah.. I might do that. > If you like I will rebase the current patches for 2.6.33-rcX as they > are in the git mirror now, I plan to track whichever kernel is used > for opensuse 11.3, currently that looks like being 2.6.33 but that may > change. > I'm sure 2.6.33 rebased patches will be useful for many users, so why not. 2.6.32 will be the 'long term' maintained stable kernel and shipping in multiple distros though. -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |