[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Jeremy's git tags

  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Dot Yet <dot.yet@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 21:31:42 -0500
  • Cc:
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:32:51 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=OXE9lsLfp1vHNpXS76ZGy5tWGhY5ezO1wc+0iEJnVSAoHYpIXueaCkWGWX1o4xlbyq rA+pH+bEgAD5hHyp+EA5NWeYj57OAPHeKHzS7UW0KxJ+l85GVjvHlbRgIvWsJnanO3Kb Mp5NHFcaEKR1UpbrkOhscjI14BD98Q2wsP0pM=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Yeah its for dom0. Too bad, i cant try them together.

I find no shame in admitting that I am not good at code hacking :)

In reality as a learning experience I wanted to use lustre based
storage between two nodes providing HA to some xen domU. At some point
I thought about using Sun's QFS, but since this is all on Lenny, its
not that easy, plus having a QFS client also requires custom kernel.

Thanks everyone.


On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 03/12/2010 12:08 PM, Dot Yet wrote:
>> OK. compilation of Lustre 1.8.2 on Jeremy's and stock
>>, both failed.
>> Can someone tell me how I can get 2.6.30.x from Jeremy's git repository?
> I think it will be easiest to get version of Lustre forward-ported rather
> than trying to backport all the Xen stuff to an older kernel.
> That's assuming that what you want is a Xen-enabled Linux kernel with dom0
> capability running Lustre.  If you just want domU support, then a stock
> kernel.org 2.6.30.x will suit your purposes.
>    J

Xen-users mailing list



Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.