[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-users] bare metal xen hypervisor
The Dom0 has direct access to hardware, so in general IO operations should be faster (better latency). DomUs access to hardware is provided by hypervisor using Dom0 - so the bits have "longer" way to roam out of the VM to real hardware. -----Original Message----- From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of forwebonly@xxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 11:32 AM To: balwant singh; Javier Guerra Giraldez Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [Xen-users] bare metal xen hypervisor Javier Guerra Giraldez wrote: >Dom0 is in fact as much a VM as any other one running on the machine; >the only differences are: ThatÂs a new information for me. Does that mean that the performance of processes in Dom0 ist not better or worse than those in any DomU? I thought that Dom0 processes have a better latency and general performance compares to those in a DomU. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |